Table 3 |
|||||||
|
Performance achieved by the perceptual features with soft majority voting in comparison to majority voting |
|||||||
|
All (%) |
Arousal (%) |
Valence (%) |
|||||
|
|
|||||||
|
UA |
WA |
UA |
WA |
UA |
WA |
||
|
|
|||||||
|
EMO-DB |
|||||||
|
P-SVM |
S-MV |
86.3 |
85.9 |
95.2 |
95.1 |
94.3 |
95.6 |
|
MV |
85.2 |
86.1 |
91.3 |
92.7 |
88.0 |
88.1 |
|
|
VAM |
|||||||
|
P-SVM |
S-MV |
61.3 |
76.2 |
69.4 |
71.7 |
59.9 |
83.3 |
|
MV |
57.1 |
74.7 |
59.2 |
73.3 |
52.4 |
77.8 |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Sezgin et al. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing 2012 2012:16 doi:10.1186/1687-4722-2012-16 |
|||||||
